The Boeing D-590 Parts Standards manual lists, in the individual listing for each standard, the manufacturer's part number for each of their products that are qualified to that standard (the hiloks, that is; this type of coverage is somehwat spotty for other types of standards, esp. The older ones). What's even more aggravating is Boeing's use of fastener codes. Their repairs contain their own (usually) three-character fastener codes, which you then have to look up to cross to the BACB30 part numbers, which you then have to look up in another table to cross to the HL part numbers. Solarwinds engineers toolset v11 keygen torrent. At least oversize fasteners are easy with Boeing part numbers: add an 'X' to the end of the complete part number for 1/64' over nominal; add a 'Y' to the end for 1/32' over; and add a 'Z' to the end for 3/64' over (though the 'Z's are pretty rare, and expensive when you can find them). Regards, Sean Shenold RE: Boeing Fasteners (Aerospace). When using oversize hi-loks, note that the BACB30MY6()X and Y Hi-Loks are obsolete due to problems with the fastener heads during production. Since the MY is a shear head protruding head hi-lok, when oversizing these fasteners use the NX tension head oversize fasteners. NOTE: this is only applicable to the 3/16' dia, all other diameter MY oversizes are OK. Reference BAC Service letter 737-51-037-A. I would assume this would go for the equivalent Hi-shear HL10, oversize, as well, but am not sure. RE: Boeing Fasteners. Thanks for all your posts, they’ve been a great help. The problem I have is we get repairs for Airbus aircraft which we should approve, but the airline has used Boeing Bacs. The allowables that we have are for HLs or Dan. Usually what happens is we get back to the airline and ask for the spec and search through to see if we can find the equivalent HL. With a conversion list this is a bit more easier. Boeing D-590 Parts Standards Manual is a link popularity checker that checks URL’s for Google Pagerank, Dmoz listing, Alexa Traffic Rank. Boeing Fasteners - Aircraft engineering. Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community. Boeing D 590 Parts Standards Manual Lists Table 1 lists examples of Customer Proprietary Cage Codes which may have special compliance to that Customer's Quality System Standard Requirements. What I’m doing now, with your suggestions is making a list of my own. RE: Boeing Fasteners (Aeronautics) 12 Nov 05 12:33. First, the disclaimers: 1) I speak neither for Boeing nor Airbus. 2) My exposure to Airbus fastener callouts is dated. 3) Take information from any source (including that I’m about to give you and point you to) other than directly the from OEM Part Standards (and Product Specifications) involved with a grain (better yet, a pound) of salt. 4) I am of the opinion that some treat aerospace fastener substitutions cavalierly. A disturbing, and potentially dangerous, “any part that fits” mind set is not uncommon. *** Make sure to run the setup.exe with Administrator permission *** After every version installation finished, we should check to make sure the software is working. And 4.1 update should not have any problems installing first regardless, but most of the problems exist in the Elsawin 5.0 update when the SQL 2008 is installed. Windows 10 will give warning that the SQL 2008 may not be compatible, but it won’t stop the installation if everything is update correctly. How to setup on Windows 10? This observation is not directed at anyone in this thread. “Hi-Loks” vs. “Lightweight” Pin Systems Quote. BACB30NW and BACB30VU are countersunk shear head hi-loks BACB30VT and BACB30VU are not “Hi-Lok” Pins. Go to and type in “BACB30VU” and then “BACB30VT”. Note that the descriptions given for these part numbers starts with “LTWT” (for “Lightweight”). Neither BACB30VT or BACB30VU are “Hi-Lok” Parts, but rather “lightweight” pins (“Hi-Lite”, “Aero-Lite”, “Veri-Lite”, etc.). My 7 Jun 05 2:04 post in details some of the reasons why “Hi-Lok” and “Lightweight” components should not be mixed, and why a certain amount of precision (pickiness, if you like) is warranted in labeling/describing them. Finish Codes: Take a look at. I filtered this spreadsheet on the first column for either “Boeing” or “Airbus” and then sorted (descending) on the third column (Hi-Lok Part Number) and scanned the result. It appears to confirm my memory: Even in the instances where Boeing and Airbus have developed company standards based on the same “basic” Hi-Lok Part Number, they typically specify a different coating/finish for their parts. Before accepting any such substitution, one of the things that I would (personally) be very sure of was that I fully understood any potential ramifications of these differences in specific application/location where they were installed. Airbus And Metric Hi-Loks: Quote. I assume AirBus is metric.My (dated) memory is (oddly enough) that the vast majority of Hi-Loks specified by Airbus were “inch” and not “metric” parts. The cross-reference file link provided (assuming it is relatively complete and current, a couple of pretty whopping assumptions) appears to confirm this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |